5 New Professional 3D Printers Launched Abroad in 2024
A machine-by-machine look at five new professional 3D printers that reached buyers outside their home markets in 2024. For engineers and sourcing staff deciding between printing a part and machining it. After reading, you can match build volume, process and material to a real part.

How to Read This Roundup
Five machines, five different jobs. The spec sheet matters less than whether your part fits the chamber and the process.
LulzBot Mini 2: A Small FFF Machine for Shop Fixtures
The Mini 2 is a compact fused filament machine with a heated bed and a self-leveling routine. Its build volume is roughly 160 × 160 × 180 mm, which puts it in the desktop class. The Z-axis cable path runs on a printed guide instead of hanging loose, so vibration and wobble stay low and surface finish improves.
Where it earns its place is jigs, soft jaws, cable clips and check fixtures. Those parts see light loads and change often. A printed fixture can be in the operator's hand the same day it is drawn.
What rules it out is anything that has to hold a tolerance or take a load. The frame is light, the nozzle is a single 0.4 mm or 0.5 mm tip, and the bed is not enclosed. ABS and PC will warp on a part taller than about 40 mm.
MIG Matrix: Large-Format Printing Without Printed Fiducials
MIG Systems built the Matrix around one problem: calibration on a big machine. It uses markerless alignment, so the head finds the work area without you taping printed targets to the plate. Setup time drops, and a job that used to need an hour of dialing in can start in minutes.
The working volume is about 760 × 610 × 610 mm, large enough to print a full dashboard bezel or a weld fixture in one piece. The gantry is modular, so a damaged rail or carriage can be swapped without scrapping the frame. That matters in a shop where the printer runs every day.
Big prints bring big distortion. On a 600 mm span, a long thin wall will curl at the ends unless you add ribs or print in a heated chamber. We see the same issue on machined parts: a 4,000 mm aluminum extrusion moves after roughing unless you leave stock and take a second pass.
The Matrix suits patterns, molds for vacuum casting and low-run production parts where a few tenths of a millimeter do not decide the fit. Parts that locate a bearing or seal a fluid path still belong on a mill or a lathe.
Formlabs Form 3: SLA for Fine Detail and Small Molds
Form 3 is a stereolithography machine with a laser and a flexible resin tank. Build volume is about 145 × 145 × 185 mm. The low-force peeling motion pulls each layer off the film with less stress than a rigid tank, so thin ribs, small holes and text come out clean.
Layer height runs from 25 μm to 100 μm depending on resin. That is fine enough to print a mold insert for a small silicone part, a connector housing with 0.5 mm walls, or a dental model with a sharp margin line.
The catch is resin. Cured photopolymer is not a structural material. It creeps under steady load, it degrades in UV, and it chips when a screw bites into it. Threads printed in resin strip the first time you torque them.
Use resin for form and fit checks, for patterns that get cast, and for small molds that see low injection pressure. Anything that clamps, threads or springs should be machined from 6061 or 17-4PH instead.
Ultimaker 3: Dual Extrusion for Soluble Supports
Ultimaker 3 is a dual-extrusion FFF machine. Two print cores let you run a build material in one nozzle and a water-soluble or breakaway support in the other. Build volume is around 215 × 215 × 200 mm with both cores installed.
Soluble support is the reason to buy it. A part with an internal channel or a deep overhang prints without a knife in your hand afterward. Dissolve the support, rinse, and the cavity is open. For a manifold or a duct with a curved bore, that saves real time.
It is still FFF. Layer lines leave a rough surface, roughly Ra 6 to 15 μm as printed, and the Z bond is weaker than the XY bond. A part loaded across the layer direction will split before a machined one yields.
Dual extrusion also costs time. Two materials mean two purge cycles, and a 12-hour print can stretch to 18. On a short run of 20 brackets, we usually machine them from 6061-T6 and anodize the batch instead.
Prusa i3 Class: The Open, Modifiable Entry Point
The i3 family is the open-source workhorse of the group. Build volume is near 250 × 210 × 210 mm, and the design is documented down to the printed parts. Owners upgrade the hotend, the bed or the controller as their needs change.
Low cost and open firmware make it a good teaching machine and a good first printer for a small shop. Spare parts are cheap, and a broken carriage is a print away from being fixed.
The trade-off is repeatability. A kit-built frame, a moving bed and no enclosure mean two machines in the same room can print the same file to different results. There is no closed calibration loop.
It is not a production machine. Running fifty identical parts with a ±0.1 mm fit requirement will fight you. Machining holds ±0.005 mm and 99.99% qualification across a run, which is why a bracket that must drop into a weld nut gets cut, not printed.
Print Versus Machine: Where Each Process Wins
A short comparison. Values come from the machine classes described above and from our own shop floor.
| Decision Point | 3D Printing | CNC Machining |
|---|---|---|
| Typical tolerance | ±0.1 to ±0.3 mm on FFF | ±0.005 mm (±0.0002 in) |
| Surface as made | Ra 6–15 μm, visible layers | Ra 0.8–1.6 μm, Ra 0.2–0.8 μm polished |
| Wall or feature minimum | About 0.4 mm, tied to nozzle | 0.5 mm typical, down to 0.2 mm |
| One-off cost | Low, no tooling | Higher per part, drops with volume |
| Volume run | Slow, cost flat per part | Fast, cost falls at 100+ parts |
| Material range | Thermoplastics, resins | Aluminium, steel, titanium, brass, plastics |
| Best fit | Form and fit, jigs, molds, ducts | Load-bearing, threaded, sealing parts |
When It Makes Sense to Print First and Machine Later
A common pattern in our shop: print the form, then cut the functional faces. The printed body confirms the shape, the clearances and how the part sits in the assembly. Once the design is frozen, the same geometry is programmed on a 5-axis center and cut from 7075 or 17-4PH.
That split works because the two processes answer different questions. Printing answers "does the shape fit?" Machining answers "does it hold, seal and last?" Trying to force one process to do both usually costs more than doing each job once.
If the printed part fails, look at the failure mode before changing the design. A split along a layer line is an orientation problem. A hole that comes out oval is a cooling problem. A thread that strips is a material problem, and no print setting will fix it.
For metal parts, we machine from the same CAD file the printer used. Tolerance, finish and material certificate come back with the parts, and the assembly sees one geometry, not two.
Questions Engineers Ask After the Shortlist
Can a 3D printed part replace a machined one?
Sometimes, for non-critical geometry. A cover, a duct or a fixture plate can be printed if the load is light and the tolerance is loose.
It cannot replace a part that carries load, seals a fluid path or takes a thread. Those need a dense, isotropic material, and layer-by-layer printing is neither.
Which of these five machines is best for functional prototypes?
For form and fit, an SLA machine like Form 3 gives the cleanest small features. For a large shell or a duct, the Matrix or a dual-extrusion FFF machine is the better pick.
For a prototype that must be tested under load, none of them. We cut the prototype from aluminium or steel and send it with an inspection report.
How do I hold a tight tolerance on a printed part?
You usually do not. FFF machines move by a tenth of a millimeter at best, and shrinkage varies with material and orientation.
The practical route is to print oversize on the mating faces and machine those faces afterward. That keeps the printed body cheap and puts the tolerance where it matters.
What does a machined version cost compared with printing?
One printed bracket can be cheaper than one machined bracket, since there is no programming and no setup time.
At a few hundred parts the picture flips. Machining amortizes setup across the run, and we hold ±0.005 mm with 100% inspection before shipment.
Do you need a different CAD file for printing and machining?
No. We work from the same STEP or IGES file the printer used.
Printed parts often need a wall thickness and a self-supporting angle added. We flag those changes in a DFM report, which comes back with the quote within 12 hours.
What materials can you machine that a printer cannot produce?
Aluminium 6061, 7075 and 2024, stainless 303, 304, 316L and 17-4PH, steel 4140, titanium TC4, Inconel, brass C36000 and engineering plastics like PEEK and POM.
We also run finishing the printer cannot do: anodizing, electroless nickel, powder coating, bead blasting and laser marking.
Send the File You Were About to Print
Upload the CAD file and get a quotation with free DFM analysis within 12 hours. One prototype or 10,000 parts, no minimum order quantity.
12-hour quote100% inspection±0.005 mmNDA on request