GreatLight CNC Machining Factory logo
CNC Machining
Rapid Prototyping
Materials
Industries
News
About GL

Get Instant Quote

Additive manufacturing in automotive trim

How the Black Rose Bentley Combines 3D Printing with Pink Gold

The Black Rose Bentley combines direct metal laser sintering with 18 carat pink gold to make trim parts that cannot be cast or milled cleanly. This page breaks down the process, the geometry it suits, and the cases where 5-axis CNC still wins. Written for design engineers and sourcing teams comparing additive and subtractive routes for small metal parts.

DMLS vs CNC18 carat pink goldSmall trim partsRecycled feedstock
Scope

What this page covers

One car interior, one process comparison, and the rules we use to pick between them.

The part

Why the Black Rose trim went to metal printing

Bentley built the Black Rose as a small limited series, and the trim pieces carry 18 carat pink gold. The shapes are thin, curved and open. A cast version would need draft on every wall and a parting line somewhere visible. A milled version would need a cutter that can reach the inside of the curve without chattering. Neither route handles that geometry well at this size.

Direct metal laser sintering builds the part layer by layer from metal powder. A laser melts a cross section, the bed drops, a recoater spreads fresh powder, and the cycle repeats. That lets the machine grow a hollow rib or a 0.6 mm wall with no draft angle and no tool access problem. The trade is surface finish and build time, not geometry.

The pink gold is the harder part of the story. Gold alloys are soft, expensive and easy to contaminate. The powder has to be handled in a closed loop, and the loose powder that does not become part of the build gets sieved and reused. Material cost per part stays high, so the design has to earn that cost.

  • 1
    No draft angleWalls can sit vertical or undercut; the powder bed supports the shape.
  • 2
    Thin ribs surviveRibs down to roughly 0.5–0.6 mm are practical in DMLS.
  • 3
    One-off geometryEach car can carry a different engraved pattern with no new tooling.
  • 4
    Powder reuseUnsintered powder is sieved and returned to the next build.
Process detail

What DMLS actually holds in tolerance

People assume printed metal is loose. It is not loose everywhere, but it is not uniform either. A DMLS part typically holds ±0.1 mm on a well-supported feature and drifts more on long unsupported spans, thin fins and tall walls. Warp comes from thermal gradients during the build, not from the laser positioning.

That matters when a trim piece has to sit flush against a machined surface. The usual answer is hybrid work: print near net shape, then take a light finishing cut on the mating face, the bore, or the screw bosses. A 5-axis machine can reach those faces after the part comes off the build plate. We run that flow often, and it is the only way to get a printed gold or stainless part to sit flat against another component.

Post-processing drives the final look more than the print does. As-built DMLS has a matte, slightly grainy surface with visible layer steps. Bead blasting removes most of that. Polishing takes it further. Laser engraving adds the fine detail, though character height below 1.5 mm stops being reliable.

Precious metal adds a cleaning step. Trapped powder inside internal channels has to come out before the part ships, and that check is done by weight and by flow, not by eye.

  • 1
    As-built surfaceRough and stepped; bead blasting is usually the first step.
  • 2
    Mating facesMachine them after printing to control flatness and fit.
  • 3
    Thin finsBelow 0.5 mm the risk of distortion rises quickly.
  • 4
    Internal channelsVerify powder removal by weight and flow before finishing.
Sustainability

The material side of sustainable luxury

The sustainability claim behind Black Rose does not rest on the printer. It rests on what goes into it and what happens to the waste. Precious metal powder is the expensive input, so the recovery loop is not optional. Sieving and reusing unsintered powder keeps a large share of the raw material in circulation across builds.

Recycled gold is a separate lever. Gold can be refined back to full purity without losing anything, so a recycled feedstock performs the same as newly mined metal in the build. That is a procurement decision, not a process decision. It changes the paper trail, not the laser parameters.

Interior textiles made from coffee by-products and personalized low-volume paint round out the picture on that car. From a manufacturing standpoint the interesting part is small batch economics. When you only build 18 of something, tooling amortization is brutal, and a digital process removes most of that fixed cost.

None of this makes printing the greener option by default. A printed part that needs heavy machining, hand polishing and a failed build or two can carry a higher footprint than a well-run casting. The honest comparison is per part and per geometry.

  • 1
    Powder loopSieved and reused powder cuts virgin material demand.
  • 2
    Recycled goldRefined gold matches new metal in the build.
  • 3
    No toolingLow volumes avoid mold and die cost entirely.
  • 4
    Per-part mathPrinting is not automatically lower impact; compare the whole route.

DMLS or CNC: picking the route

Use this as a first filter before you request a quote.

FactorDMLS metal printing5-axis CNC
Best geometryHollow, organic, undercutPrismatic, tight-tolerance faces
Typical tolerance±0.1 mm as built±0.005 mm
Surface finishRa 4–10 μm as builtRa 0.2–1.6 μm
Small batch costLow fixed cost, high unit costHigher setup, lower unit cost
Large volumeSlow and costlyFast and repeatable
Material rangeLimited metal powdersAluminium, steel, stainless, titanium, brass
Finishing needUsually blasting or polishingOften as-machined or light polish
Selection

When a printed part should be machined instead

If the part is a bracket, a housing, a manifold block, or anything that has to bolt to something else with a controlled fit, printing is usually the wrong first choice. Those parts are prismatic. A 5-axis machine cuts them faster, holds ±0.005 mm, and leaves a finish that needs no secondary operation.

There is also a size ceiling. DMLS build envelopes are far smaller than a 4,000 mm machining travel. Long trim rails, structural members and panels never fit in a powder bed. Once a part passes roughly 300 mm in its longest dimension, the printing conversation usually ends.

Material choice narrows the field too. Titanium, stainless, aluminium and a few tool steels print well. Copper and gold alloys are printable but tricky because they reflect the laser and conduct heat away from the melt pool. If your part is 7075 aluminium or 17-4PH stainless with a tight bore, we would machine it.

The practical split is simple. Print the shape that cannot be cut. Machine the surfaces that have to be exact. A hybrid part, printed near net and finished on a 5-axis center, is often cheaper than either route alone.

  • 1
    Choose printingOrganic ribs, hollow sections, one-off engraved detail.
  • 2
    Choose machiningBores, threads, flat mating faces, tight positional tolerance.
  • 3
    Choose bothPrinted body plus a light finishing pass on critical faces.
Sourcing

What to send for a printed or hybrid part

A STEP file is the starting point, but the print orientation matters as much as the model. Tell us which faces are cosmetic and which are functional. Those two sets of faces drive the build direction and the support strategy, and they change the price.

Give us the alloy and the finish in writing. For metal printing, specify the powder and whether recycled feedstock is acceptable. For gold and other precious metals, say who supplies the powder, because the recovery loop has to be agreed before the build starts, not after.

State the tolerance on each critical feature rather than a blanket note. A printed part with a ±0.005 mm callout on every dimension is not a printable part; it is a machined part. Mark the two or three faces that matter and let the rest run as-built.

We quote from the drawing and return a DFM note within 12 hours. If the geometry would be cheaper to mill, we say so. Uploads stay confidential and an NDA is available on request.

  • 1
    ModelSTEP plus a note on build orientation and cosmetic faces.
  • 2
    FinishName the process: bead blast, polish, plating or engraving.
  • 3
    ToleranceFlag critical features only, not every dimension.
  • 4
    VolumeOne prototype or a 10,000-part run, same quote form.
FAQs

Questions engineers ask next

Can DMLS hold ±0.005 mm?

Not on its own. As-built tolerance is closer to ±0.1 mm on a supported feature, and thin or tall walls drift beyond that.

To reach ±0.005 mm you print near net shape and then machine the critical faces. That is a two-process route, not a printing capability.

Is recycled gold powder weaker than new powder?

No. Gold refining returns the metal to full purity, so the feedstock behaves the same in the melt pool.

The real risk is contamination from handling, not the recycling itself. Sieving, storage and powder handling controls matter more than the origin of the metal.

What is the smallest feature you can print in metal?

Internal channels down to about 0.4 mm are possible, and ribs around 0.5–0.6 mm hold reliably.

Below that, distortion, powder entrapment and cleaning problems grow faster than the design benefit. Very fine detail is often better laser engraved after the build.

When should we skip printing and just machine the part?

When the part is prismatic, when it has a tight bore or thread, or when it must bolt to another component with a controlled fit.

When the longest dimension passes roughly 300 mm, printing stops being practical anyway. A 5-axis machine handles up to 4,000 mm and holds tolerance on the first setup.

How do you handle powder trapped inside a printed part?

Internal channels get a defined escape path in the model, then the part is cleaned and checked by weight and flow.

For precious metals we weigh before and after cleaning. A part that still holds powder is not released.

Do we need a different file for printing and for machining?

Usually yes. The print gets a small stock allowance on faces that will be machined afterward.

Send the finished geometry and flag which faces are critical. We add the allowance and set the build orientation from there.

Send the part, get a route recommendation

Upload a STEP file and we reply within 12 hours with a quote and a note on whether printing, machining or a hybrid route is cheaper for your geometry.

12-hour quoteFree DFM analysisNDA on request

Trusted by engineers and manufacturers worldwide

Tesla Ford Motor Company BYD Auto Denso Magna International Boeing Airbus Medtronic KUKA FANUC