GreatLight CNC Machining Factory logo
CNC Machining
Rapid Prototyping
Materials
Industries
News
About GL

Get Instant Quote

Milling Basics

Basic Knowledge of CNC Side Milling

This cut forms a vertical wall with the periphery of the cutter, not the tip. The guide below covers cutter geometry, depth settings, workholding and the cases where another strategy is the better call. Written for engineers and buyers who need to judge a part before it goes on the machine.

Radial vs axial depthWall straightnessClimb vs conventional16 five-axis centers
Basic knowledge of CNC milling in tool room
Overview

What this page covers

A working explanation of the process: how the cut is made, which numbers matter, and where it stops being economical.

Definition

What the cut actually is

Material is removed by the cylindrical periphery of the cutter while the tool axis stays parallel to the wall being produced. The cutting edges on the side of the tool do the work, and the corner radius or tip only touches the floor of the feature. That is the difference from face milling, where the bottom edge of the tool sweeps a flat surface and the side edges barely engage.

Because the wall is generated by the side of the tool, the finished surface carries the tool marks of the flute geometry. A four-flute cutter leaves a different pattern than a two-flute or a variable-pitch tool. On aluminium a high helix pushes chips up and out; on stainless a lower helix and a tougher substrate keep the edge from chipping.

Any feature with a straight or contoured vertical face can be cut this way: pockets, slots, shoulders, bosses, open profiles and the outside of a plate. The same motion also does the roughing pass that clears material before a finishing pass runs along the wall at a smaller radial stepover.

  • 1
    Peripheral contactThe side of the cutter generates the wall; the tip generates the floor.
  • 2
    Axial depth (ap)How deep the tool engages along its axis, up to the flute length.
  • 3
    Radial depth (ae)How much of the cutter diameter bites into the material.
Tool Geometry

Matching the cutter to the wall

Cutter diameter sets the minimum internal radius you can cut. A Ø10 mm end mill cannot produce a corner tighter than about 5 mm, so a 3 mm radius in a pocket corner forces a smaller tool or a separate operation with a smaller cutter and a longer reach. Engineers should check corner radii against the drawing before releasing the part, because that single number often decides how many setups are needed.

Flute count trades chip room against rigidity. Two and three flutes clear large chips and suit aluminium, plastics and roughing cuts where the chip is bulky. Four and five flutes give a stiffer core and a smoother wall, which helps on steel, titanium and finishing passes. Variable-pitch geometry breaks up chatter harmonics and is worth the cost on thin walls.

Helix angle controls the direction the cutting force pushes the chip and the work. A 45° helix is a common general-purpose choice. Higher helix angles, 50° to 60°, pull chips up and reduce recutting in deep pockets, but they also pull the part upward, so workholding has to resist that lift. On a thin floor, that lift is the failure mode you watch.

  • 1
    Corner radius ruleSmallest internal radius equals half the cutter diameter.
  • 2
    Reach-to-diameterKeep the gauge length under about 4×D to limit deflection.
  • 3
    CoatingAlTiN for steel and stainless; uncoated or DLC for aluminium.
Cutting Parameters

Depth of cut, stepover and feed

Two numbers define the load on the tool: axial depth and radial depth. Traditional practice uses a small axial depth and a large radial engagement, often 50% of the diameter or more. High-efficiency milling flips that, using the full flute length axially and a radial stepover of 5% to 10% of the diameter. The second approach spreads wear along more of the edge and cuts the cycle time on deep walls.

Feed per tooth is the number that matters, not table feed alone. Surface speed drops as the tool gets smaller, and feed per tooth drops with it. A Ø12 mm carbide cutter in 6061 aluminium may run at 300–500 m/min surface speed and 0.05–0.10 mm per tooth; the same cutter in 316 stainless runs far slower, closer to 60–90 m/min, with a lighter chip load.

Climb milling is the default on a CNC with ball screws. The cutter engages the material at maximum chip thickness and exits at zero, which pushes the tool away from the finished wall and leaves a cleaner surface. Conventional milling does the opposite and is mostly reserved for rough castings with a hard skin or for older machines with backlash.

  • 1
    Light radial, full axialGood for deep walls and long reach tools.
  • 2
    Heavy radial, light axialGood for shallow pockets and rigid setups.
  • 3
    Climb millingDefault on modern CNC; better finish and tool life.
Reference

Typical starting points by material

Values are starting points for carbide tooling with good coolant and a rigid setup. Adjust to the actual machine and holder.

MaterialSurface speed (m/min)Feed per tooth (mm)Notes
6061 aluminium300–5000.05–0.10High helix, uncoated or DLC
7075 aluminium200–3500.04–0.08Lower speed, sharp edges
303 / 304 stainless60–900.02–0.05AlTiN coating, flood coolant
17-4PH stainless40–700.02–0.04Rigid holder, light stepover
1018 / 1045 steel120–2000.03–0.07AlTiN or TiAlN coating
Ti-6Al-4V30–600.02–0.05High pressure coolant, sharp edge
POM / PEEK200–4000.05–0.12Sharp edge, air blast
Accuracy

Holding a straight wall and a tight tolerance

Tool deflection is the main enemy of wall accuracy. A long, thin cutter pushed sideways bends away from the material, so the top of the wall ends up oversize and the bottom undersize. The fix is a shorter gauge length, a larger diameter where the geometry allows it, and a lighter radial stepover. A finishing pass of 0.2–0.5 mm radial depth removes the deflected surface left by the roughing pass.

Thermal growth matters on long runs. The spindle, the ball screws and the workpiece all move as the machine warms up. On parts with a ±0.005 mm tolerance, that drift alone can consume the whole band. Warm-up cycles and in-process probing keep the tool on the nominal path instead of chasing the error after the fact.

Thin walls add a second problem: the wall moves as the material around it is removed. Rought out both sides, leave a uniform allowance, and finish in a sequence that keeps the wall supported. Sometimes the answer is a fixture that backs the wall, or a change in the order of operations so the stiff side is cut last.

  • 1
    Finish allowanceLeave 0.2–0.5 mm radial for the finishing pass.
  • 2
    Spring passesA zero-stepover pass cleans up deflection marks.
  • 3
    ProbingUse in-process probing on tolerances under ±0.01 mm.
Fit and Limits

When this strategy is the wrong call

A wall shorter than the cutter diameter is usually cut faster with a face mill or a shoulder cutter. Those tools engage more edge at once and clear the floor in fewer passes. Reserving the side strategy for walls deep enough to need the flute length keeps the cycle time honest.

Internal corners with a radius under about 1 mm are a different problem. The tool that can reach the corner is small enough to deflect or break, and the wall beside it suffers. It is often cheaper to relax that corner to a standard radius, or to cut the sharp detail on a sinker EDM after milling the rest of the cavity.

Very deep, narrow slots push the reach-to-diameter ratio past what a solid carbide cutter can hold. Above roughly 6×D, chatter and taper show up even with reduced feeds. A larger cutter with a relieved shank, or a different process such as wire EDM for a through slot, usually beats fighting the deflection.

  • 1
    Shallow wallsFace milling or shoulder milling is faster below about 1×D.
  • 2
    Sharp cornersRelax the radius or plan an EDM operation.
  • 3
    Deep narrow slotsAbove 6×D reach, expect taper and chatter.
FAQs

Questions engineers ask

What is the difference between side milling and face milling?

Face milling cuts with the bottom edge of the tool to produce a flat surface; the tool axis is perpendicular to the surface. Side milling cuts with the periphery to produce a vertical wall; the tool axis is parallel to that wall.

Many parts need both. A pocket floor is face milled and its walls are side milled, often in the same toolpath with the same cutter.

How deep can one pass go?

It depends on the axial depth the tool can take and the rigidity of the setup. A stub-length carbide cutter in aluminium can take its full flute length in a high-efficiency pass with a 5% to 10% radial stepover.

In steel or titanium, start at one-third to one-half of the diameter axially and increase only when the spindle load and the finish allow it.

Why does my wall taper from top to bottom?

Taper almost always comes from tool deflection. The cutting force pushes the bottom of the tool away while the top stays on the nominal path.

Shorten the gauge length, reduce the radial stepover, or run a finishing pass at 0.2–0.5 mm radial depth. Check the holder too; a worn collet adds runout that shows up as taper.

Climb or conventional milling for a finishing pass?

Use climb milling on any machine with ball screws and low backlash. The edge enters at maximum chip thickness and exits at zero, so it tends to pull the tool away from the finished surface.

Conventional milling is the safer choice on an older machine with visible backlash, or when cutting through a hard cast skin that would chip a climb-milling edge.

Which materials can be side milled?

Aluminium, stainless steel, carbon steel, copper and brass, titanium alloys, magnesium and most engineering plastics can all be cut this way. The tool geometry, coating and surface speed change with the material, not the strategy.

Hardened tool steel above roughly 45 HRC is usually cut on a dedicated hard-milling machine with CBN or ceramic tooling, and the feeds drop sharply.

What tolerance and finish can a side milling operation hold?

On a rigid machine with a short, stiff cutter, wall position can hold ±0.005 mm and surface finish can reach Ra 0.2–0.8 μm with a finishing pass.

A general as-machined finish sits around Ra 1.6–3.2 μm. Tighter numbers need a controlled setup, temperature stability and in-process inspection.

Send the drawing, get a process plan

Upload your part and we will review wall thickness, corner radii and tolerances, then quote the operation and the finishing pass needed to hold it.

12-hour quote100% inspectionNo minimum order quantity

Trusted by engineers and manufacturers worldwide

Tesla Ford Motor Company BYD Auto Denso Magna International Boeing Airbus Medtronic KUKA FANUC