Markforged Evaluation: 5 Key Additive Manufacturing Factors
Continuous-fiber printing solves a narrow set of problems well, and it fails in predictable places. This page breaks the decision into five factors engineers can measure: material anisotropy, dimensional accuracy, unit cost at volume, surface finish, and qualification paperwork. Read it if you are weighing an in-house printer against a machined or hybrid route.

In this article
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
Key takeaways
Material properties and anisotropy in a Markforged evaluation
A continuous-fiber Markforged part is a composite with a direction. The matrix is usually Onyx, a chopped-carbon nylon, and a second nozzle lays continuous carbon fiber, fiberglass, or Kevlar inside the same toolpath. Because the fiber head deposits in the XY plane, stiffness follows the fiber direction and drops sharply through the part thickness.
That is the whole point of the process, and it is also the main engineering risk. Flexural strength along the fiber can exceed cast nylon by a wide margin. Interlaminar shear strength, impact resistance, and Z-axis tensile strength are much lower. A bracket that looks overbuilt can split along a layer line under a peel or shear load.
So the first question in a Markforged evaluation is not "how strong is Onyx?" It is "which load path does this part carry, and in which axis?" If the dominant load is bending along the fiber, the part can be very light. If the load pulls the layers apart, the same geometry may fail early.
Design around this by orienting the part on the bed so the primary tension runs in the XY plane, and by adding a machined or bonded insert at joints that see peel. Where behavior must be identical in every axis, a wrought billet is the safer answer. Aluminum 6061-T6, 7075, and 17-4PH stainless are isotropic, and their allowables are published rather than tested per orientation.
- 1Good fitFlat brackets, jigs, end-effector arms loaded in bending along the fiber.
- 2Poor fitParts loaded in peel, through-thickness shear, or repeated impact.
- 3WatchNylon absorbs moisture, so stiffness shifts with humidity and temperature.
Dimensional accuracy and repeatability
Closed-loop extrusion control has made desktop composite printing far more repeatable than it was five years ago. It has not made it a machining center. For a Markforged evaluation, ask for the tolerance on the specific feature you care about, not a single headline number for the whole part.
Large flat panels bow as they cool. Long holes come out slightly oval. Thin walls can drift by a few tenths of a millimeter depending on layer height and bed position. Locating holes, bearing bores, and mating faces are where this shows up first, because they need a fit that repeats across every unit in a batch.
The usual fix is a hybrid route: print near net shape, then machine the critical features. Ream a Ø6 H7 bore, face a sealing surface, or drill dowel holes after printing. This is normal practice and it works. It also adds a second operation, a second setup, and a second vendor if the printer sits in a different building.
GreatLight runs 127 CNC machines, including 16 simultaneous 5-axis centers, and holds ±0.005 mm on complex contours. If your part needs interchangeable fits across thousands of units, machining the functional surfaces after printing is usually cheaper than chasing print tolerance.
- 1Print to fitNon-critical covers, cable guides, low-load housings.
- 2Print then machineBearing bores, dowel holes, gasket faces, threaded inserts.
- 3Machine onlyInterchangeable parts with published allowables and full traceability.
Production volume and unit cost
Printing has almost no tooling cost. That is why it wins on one-off fixtures and low-volume brackets, and why it stops winning once volume climbs. Each part still consumes machine time, fiber, and operator attention.
CNC machining flips the curve. Setup is front-loaded: programming, fixturing, and first-article inspection. Once the process is stable, cycle time per part drops and the amortized cost falls with volume. Above a few hundred units per year per part number, machining is normally the lower unit cost, especially when the geometry is simple and the material is a standard aluminum or stainless grade.
The crossover point depends on part size, feature count, and how much post-processing the printed part needs. A small printed bracket that ships as-built may stay competitive longer. A large printed housing that needs sanding, sealing, and reamed bores crosses over much earlier.
There is also a floor to consider. GreatLight has no minimum order quantity, so a single prototype and a 10,000-part run go through the same quoting path. That makes it practical to machine the prototype, test it, and keep the same process for production instead of re-qualifying a new route later.
- 1Low volumePrototypes, fixtures, bridge tooling, replacement parts.
- 2High volumeInterchangeable components, safety-related brackets, sealed enclosures.
- 3HybridPrint the shell, machine the interfaces, assemble with inserts.
Surface finish and post-processing requirements
Fused filament printing leaves layer lines. On a vertical wall they read as visible texture; on a top surface they read as a slightly rough skin. The as-built finish is functional for many jigs and covers, and unacceptable for anything that slides, seals, or gets painted to a class A standard.
Post-processing is where printed parts quietly lose their cost advantage. Sanding is labor. Vapor smoothing changes dimensions and needs a fixture to stop warping. Sealing a nylon part against fluid means a coating, and the coating has to survive the same temperature and chemical exposure as the substrate. Each step adds a day or more.
Machined surfaces are defined up front. As-machined aluminum sits around Ra 1.6–3.2 μm, and a finishing pass gets to Ra 0.8–1.6 μm. Fine work reaches Ra 0.2–0.8 μm on sealing faces and bearing bores. Anodizing, bead blasting, electroless nickel, and powder coating are standard follow-on steps, so the drawing, the finish, and the inspection report all describe the same part.
If the printed part needs a cosmetic surface, plan the finishing route before you commit. Bead blasting hides light layer lines on a flat panel. It will not fix a stepped curved surface, and it rounds sharp edges that may be functional.
- 1As-built is fineInternal brackets, jigs, cable routing, non-visible housings.
- 2Light finishingBead blast or tumble to soften layer lines and edges.
- 3Functional finishAnodize, hardcoat, electroless nickel, or fine machining of seal faces.
Software, qualification, and regulatory compliance
Print parameters live in software. Fiber fill pattern, wall count, layer height, and orientation all change the mechanical result, which means the qualified part is the process plus the file plus the machine, not the CAD model alone. Change any of those and the qualification evidence no longer applies.
That is workable for internal tooling. It gets harder for aerospace, medical devices, and automotive production parts. Those buyers usually need material certificates, process coupons tested in the build orientation, dimensional reports, and a documented change-control path. Some also need the build record tied to the serial number on the part.
Machining carries a simpler chain. The material certificate names the heat and the standard, the process is defined by the drawing and the program, and inspection data covers the finished dimensions. GreatLight holds ISO 9001:2015, IATF 16949:2016, ISO 13485:2016, and ISO 27001:2022, with 100% inspection before shipment and reports on request.
For a Markforged evaluation, list what the program actually requires before comparing hardware. If the answer is "process coupons and full traceability," a printed part may still qualify with enough testing. If it needs isotropic allowables and a material cert per lot, the decision is already made.
- 1Internal usePrint parameters under your own control, no external audit.
- 2Regulated productCoupons, certificates, change control, serialized build records.
- 3Machined routeMaterial cert, drawing-defined process, dimensional report per lot.
Five factors side by side
Use this as a first filter before requesting quotes.
| Factor | Continuous-fiber print | CNC machined part | Practical rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anisotropy | Strong in XY, weak in Z | Isotropic in every axis | Peel or shear load: machine it |
| Tolerance | Feature-dependent, drifts with humidity | ±0.005 mm on complex contours | Bearing fits: ream after printing |
| Unit cost | Flat, no tooling | Falls as volume rises | Above a few hundred a year: machine |
| Surface finish | Layered as-built | Ra 0.8–1.6 μm standard | Sealing or sliding faces: machine |
| Qualification | Process plus file plus machine | Material cert plus drawing | Regulated parts: check the paperwork first |
When to print, when to machine
Choose continuous-fiber printing for low-volume, flat, bending-loaded parts with no sealing or bearing fits. Choose CNC machining when the part carries load in more than one axis, needs interchangeable fits, or must ship with material certificates and dimensional reports. For everything in between, print near net shape and machine the critical features.
Questions engineers ask next
Can a printed composite part replace a machined aluminum bracket?
Sometimes. It works when the load runs along the fiber direction and the part is stiff rather than strong. It stops working when the bracket sees peel, through-thickness shear, or repeated impact, because those loads attack the layer bonds.
Check the load path first, then the temperature and moisture the part will see. Nylon picks up moisture and loses stiffness, so a bracket that passes a dry bench test may behave differently after a season in a humid plant.
What tolerance can I realistically expect from continuous-fiber printing?
Treat the printed tolerance as feature-dependent. Small features on a stable bed repeat well. Long spans, thin walls, and tall builds drift more, and a single number for the whole part is misleading.
If a bore or a mating face has to repeat across a batch, print near net shape and machine that feature. Reaming a Ø6 H7 bore after printing takes minutes and removes the variability from the fit.
At what volume does machining become cheaper per part?
It depends on part size, feature count, and how much post-processing the printed version needs. As a working rule, simple parts cross over somewhere between 50 and a few hundred units per year per part number.
Parts with sealing faces or bearing fits cross over earlier, because the printed route needs extra operations that the machined route does not. Ask for both quotes at the target volume rather than comparing one-off prices.
Do I need separate finishing after printing?
Usually, if the surface is visible or functional. As-built layer lines are fine for internal brackets and jigs. Sliding surfaces, seal faces, and cosmetic panels need sanding, sealing, or machining.
Plan the finishing step before you commit to the print route. Sanding and sealing add labor and lead time, and smoothing methods can move dimensions, which matters on parts that assemble with others.
What documents should I ask for on a regulated part?
Ask for the material certificate, dimensional inspection data, and the process parameters tied to the build. For regulated programs, also ask how changes to fiber pattern, layer height, or machine are controlled and communicated.
The qualified item is the process plus the file plus the machine, not the CAD model. Any change to those three invalidates earlier test data, so the change-control path matters as much as the first test report.
Can printing and machining run in one supply chain?
Yes, and that is often the practical answer. Print the shell or the low-load body, then machine the interfaces, bores, and seal faces on a CNC. The two steps use different equipment but one drawing and one inspection plan.
GreatLight runs additive and machining services under one roof, with quotation and free DFM analysis within 12 hours and production starting within 24 hours. Parts normally ship in 3–5 days.
Send the drawing, get a process recommendation
Upload your part and we will tell you whether printing, machining, or a hybrid route fits better, with a quote and DFM notes within 12 hours.
12-hour quote±0.005 mm toleranceNo MOQNDA on request