Aviation CNC Parts: Tolerances, Materials and Process Choices
A working guide for design and sourcing engineers who buy machined airframe, engine and ground-support components. It covers which features belong on a 5-axis mill, when a 3-axis machine is the better call, how material grade changes the process, and what to check on the inspection report before you release a batch.

What this page covers
Flight hardware is not a single category. A bracket, a hydraulic manifold and a titanium engine mount share a machine tool but not a process plan. This guide separates them by feature type, material and inspection requirement.
Which components actually go on a CNC mill
Structural brackets, ribs, stringers, actuator housings, fuel and hydraulic manifolds, avionics chassis, and ground-support tooling all start as billet or plate. The common thread is low volume and tight geometry rather than high volume. A run of 40 wing ribs is normal. A run of 40,000 is not, which is why machining stays competitive against casting and forging for this class of part.
Five-axis work earns its cost when a part has features on more than three faces, when a contoured surface must hold position to a datum, or when the setup itself would introduce stack-up error. A one-piece bracket replacing three riveted plates is a typical case. Machining it in one setup removes the assembly tolerance entirely.
Not every part needs five axes. Flat plates, simple bushings and turned fittings are cheaper and faster on a 3-axis mill or a lathe. Putting them on a 5-axis center adds spindle time without improving the part. We route work to the machine that fits the geometry, not the other way around.
- 1Good fit for 5-axisContoured pockets, angled bosses, features on four or more faces
- 2Good fit for 3-axisFlat plates, covers, shims, simple drilled patterns
- 3Good fit for mill-turnShafts and fittings with milled flats or cross holes
- 4Consider a different processVery thin-walled ducting or large hollow shells
Material grade drives the whole process plan
Aluminum 7075-T6 is the default for loaded structure because of its strength-to-weight ratio, but it is less forgiving than 6061. It machines cleanly at the right feeds and chips badly at the wrong ones. We run it on rigid setups with high-pressure coolant. If a part is mostly cosmetic or lightly loaded, 6061-T6 costs less and cuts faster.
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V (TC4) is where process control matters most. It conducts heat poorly, so the cutting edge takes the temperature. Tool life drops fast if speeds and feeds drift. Roughing with high-feed toolpaths and finishing with light radial engagement keeps heat down and holds the ±0.005 mm tolerance on long features. Expect longer cycle times than aluminum by a wide margin.
Stainless 17-4PH (SUS630) and 316L cover corrosion-exposed fittings and brackets. 17-4PH machines better in the solution-treated condition and gains strength after aging. Inconel and magnesium AZ31B or AZ91D appear in exhaust-adjacent and weight-critical housings. Magnesium needs chip control and fire-safe handling, so it is quoted separately.
Material and feature quick reference
Use this to pick a grade before sending an RFQ. Values are typical, not a substitute for a drawing review.
| Material | Typical aviation use | Machining note |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum 7075-T6 | Loaded brackets, ribs, fittings | Strong, less forgiving than 6061 |
| Aluminum 6061-T6 | Panels, housings, light brackets | Fast to cut, good finish as machined |
| Aluminum 2024 | Skin-adjacent structure | Good fatigue behavior, tighter chip control |
| Ti-6Al-4V (TC4) | Engine mounts, hot-side brackets | Slow speeds, high heat at the edge |
| 17-4PH (SUS630) | Corrosion-exposed fittings | Machines well before aging |
| 316L stainless | Fluid and fuel line parts | Gummy, needs sharp tooling |
| Inconel | Exhaust and high-temp housings | Very low speeds, heavy tool wear |
| Magnesium AZ31B | Weight-critical housings | Chip and fire control required |
Setting tolerances that the process can actually hold
A blanket ±0.005 mm callout on every dimension raises cost and inspection time without improving function. Apply tight tolerance to the features that locate the part: bore diameters, mounting hole positions, mating faces. Leave non-critical thickness and edge dimensions at ±0.1 mm or looser. The drawing should show which is which.
Surface finish follows the same logic. A sealing face may need Ra 0.2–0.8 μm, while an internal pocket at Ra 1.6–3.2 μm as machined is fine. Hardcoat anodizing adds 0.02–0.05 mm per surface, so a tight bore should be masked or the pre-plate dimension adjusted. We flag this during DFM review rather than after the parts come off the machine.
Feature size limits matter. Deep pockets with a small corner radius need a long, thin tool that deflects. If a pocket is 60 mm deep with a 2 mm corner, the tool will chatter. Opening the corner radius to 3 mm or splitting the pocket into two operations often solves it. These calls are easier to make at the drawing stage than in the vise.
- 1Tolerance±0.005 mm (±0.0002 in) on critical features
- 2Fine finishRa 0.2–0.8 μm for sealing and bearing faces
- 3Standard finishRa 0.8–1.6 μm for most mating surfaces
- 4As-machinedRa 1.6–3.2 μm for non-contact pockets
Inspection and documentation before shipment
Every batch goes through raw material verification, in-process checks and a final inspection before it leaves the floor. We report on request. That report matters more on aviation work than on most industrial parts because the paper trail is part of the deliverable, not an extra.
First-article inspection covers the critical dimensions from the drawing, and the setup is not released to production until those numbers are signed off. In-process checks catch tool wear on long runs. Final inspection confirms the part matches the released drawing and that surface finish and any plating thickness are within spec.
The shop holds ISO 9001:2015, IATF 16949:2016, ISO 13485:2016 and ISO 27001:2022. The last one covers how we handle customer drawings and models. Uploads are treated as confidential and an NDA is available on request before any file changes hands.
From RFQ to shipped parts
Quotation and a free DFM analysis come back within 12 hours of a complete RFQ. Production can start within 24 hours once the drawing and material are confirmed. Standard parts ship in 3–5 days. The historical late-delivery probability across our work is below 2%, which is the number we track rather than a promise on any single order.
There is no minimum order quantity. A single prototype and a 10,000-part run go through the same quoting path. For aviation programs, most work sits between 1 and 500 pieces, where machining beats tooling cost. When a design stabilizes and volume climbs past that range, we will say so and point to casting or forging instead.
The shop runs 127 high-precision CNC machines, including 16 simultaneous 5-axis centers, 12 four-axis mills, 27 three-axis machines and 16 mill-turn centers. Maximum processing size is 4,000 mm, with a Ø400 mm rotary table for parts that need positioning on a trunnion. Three wholly-owned plants and 150 technicians cover the floor.
Common questions from engineers
Can you machine a part from a customer-supplied forging or casting?
Yes. Send the blank drawing or model with the finished part drawing so we can plan the stock allowance and workholding.
We will confirm datums and any surfaces that must stay as-cast before the first cut.
How do you handle a tight bore that will be anodized afterward?
Hardcoat anodizing adds roughly 0.02–0.05 mm per surface. We either mask the bore or adjust the pre-plate dimension so the finished size lands in spec.
This is flagged in the DFM review, not left to the finishing vendor.
What is the largest part you can machine in one setup?
Up to 4,000 mm on the long travel machines, with a 4,000 × 400 × 150 mm envelope on the largest.
Medium and compact envelopes cover 750 × 1,150 × 550 mm down to 500 × 310 × 200 mm.
Do you sign an NDA before I send drawings?
Yes. An NDA is available on request and can be executed before any file is uploaded.
Uploads are handled as confidential under ISO 27001:2022 procedures.
Can you provide first-article inspection reports?
Yes. Reports are provided on request and cover the critical dimensions identified on the drawing.
Raw material certificates can be included when the program requires traceability.
When is machining the wrong choice for an aviation part?
When the geometry is a large thin-walled shell or a hollow duct with uniform wall, and the annual volume is high enough to amortize tooling.
In that case casting or a fabricated assembly usually wins on cost. We will tell you if that is the case.
Send a drawing and get a process plan back
Quotation and free DFM analysis within 12 hours. No minimum order quantity, from one prototype to a 10,000-part run.
12-hour quote100% inspectionNDA on request±0.005 mm